Max King of the Wild said:
HylianSwordsman said:
From the Xbox 360 yes. And that's all they needed to do. Hence why PS3 has gradually caught up and overtaken 360. However, Microsoft has also invested in 1st party this gen, much more so than Sony. Sony needs to step up their game with 1st party. For the first time in history, Microsoft actually has a 1st party advantage over Sony. And they look like they're going to keep it well into 2015 at the least. Sony has a few things, but nothing that outdoes Microsoft. If Microsoft can gain traction once it gets more 1st parties, it'll steal market share more from Sony than from Nintendo. Which would leave the race much, much closer if Nintendo can gain some traction as well. But hey, wouldn't a close race be much more fun to watch than a Wii or PS2 style domination race? I for one hope it turns out that way, just for the fun of watching it. Otherwise I don't care that much. I get all the games I want either way, I just come here because for some reason I find watching charts to be really interesting.
|
So much wrong with this post. First off, MS isnt even close to Sony first party. Sony had Knack and KZ when MS had KI and forza. Then sony is getting Infamous (second party) l, mlb the show and the order 1886 while MS is getting.... maybe halo 2 anniversary. The Wii hardly dominated too. It never got 50% market share and dropping closrr to 33% week after week. Ps2 recieved 70% market share (thats domination)
|
A little correction, inFamous is as 1st party as it gets. Sony owned IP made by a 1st party studio that is part of the WWS.
