By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Sevengen said:
JoeTheBro said:
The main point of the OP is "innovation" and not once was HDMI in mentioned? Crazy.

That's by far the system's biggest innovation. Kinect's been around since the 360 so it's disqualified. Plus the PS4 can do 99% of the things Kinect 2 can, just not as good. In fact if you ignore HDMI in, the PS4 is more innovative than the XBOX ONE considering game streaming.

if the main point of the OP was about innovation, well then, maybe I would have written more about the X1 being innovative.. maybe even put that in the thread's title.
To be honest though you're right. The OP is about innovation, I just thought I'd trick everybody and not put that in the title, instead going with E3 and Kinect and then expading on those two bits of devious misinformation in the main body by talking about E3 and Kinect.

You're the first one to catch on to this.

lol

Let's go back to elementary school. Remember the sandwich?

That's how the op is structured, more or less. Here's your conclusion.

"The PS4 is the more powerful, less expensive machine; the Xbox One is the more interesting and forward thinking alternative.
Price or innovation?
Innovation always wins in the long run.. would you be reading this on your tablet or smartphone if it didn't?"

According to pretty much any website:

A conclusion should

  • stress the importance of the thesis statement,
  • give the essay a sense of completeness, and
  • leave a final impression on the reader.

 

Silly me for assuming your conclusion included the main point of the OP.