| S.T.A.G.E. said:
1) You're incorrect. A primary controller is what controls the whole system. Cant play proper games with the Kinect unless they are designed around the Kinect. The tech isnt sophisticated enough hence why Sony created the move. The Wii mote was a primary controller for the Wii. Its true value couldn't be realized without it. Do not put your subjective opinion into this. I like the Kinect...but objectively speaking...it is not primary. I also do not see the purpose in its bundling at the moment as nothing outside of the UI is utilizing it. 2) Microsoft has no technical vision for the Kinect, they are just trying to profit off of primesenses work. Primesense is gone off and doing their on thing now. MS is trying to force that device down everyones throat now. Microsoft only pays attention to what sells. They dont care about the quality of the overall product. It was a fad riding off of the Wii's success. MS knows this, hence why they force bundled it. 3) Incorrect on so many levels. This is Sonys third Eyetoy. They've NEVER FORCED BUNDLED IT. This is not an arugment. Sorry to say. Was nice chatting. |
Stage, you need to do your research better. Before Primesense MS was doing camera base tech. Primesense allowed MS to come to market sooner and cheaper. With Kinect 2, MS no longer use primesense because the tech they were working with became more affordable. As for forcing a device down your throat thats BS. A company has a product and a vision, you have the right to not purchase it. Nobody is forcing anything on you because you have the right to just say no.
3)You are right, Sony never committed to the Eyetoy. They never risk anything on the device and after a few products every time it went no where. At least Nintendo had the balls to risk their business on the Wiimote and I would say at least MS is willing to take risk as well.
