| dane007 said: @STAGE 1) Well i would say so since evertything of xbox one is built around the kinect. when it was always online ,, you need the kinect to switch it on. 2) Well i would say yes especially if a company wants to achieve its vision. You got to start somewhere and you may never get it right straightaway,, butif you keep at it,, then reward will be oustanding 3) Thats because sony saw the level of hate MS got from gamers with what they revealed. Sony is not in financial state to have another PS3 fiasco which saw them lose alot of money. Because of MS blunder they saw tha they had a upper hand to make theiur console more successful then the competiion. If sony experienced another ps3 launch,, who knows what would have happen to them right? |
1) You're incorrect. A primary controller is what controls the whole system. Cant play proper games with the Kinect unless they are designed around the Kinect. The tech isnt sophisticated enough hence why Sony created the move. The Wii mote was a primary controller for the Wii. Its true value couldn't be realized without it. Do not put your subjective opinion into this. I like the Kinect...but objectively speaking...it is not primary. I also do not see the purpose in its bundling at the moment as nothing outside of the UI is utilizing it.
2) Microsoft has no technical vision for the Kinect, they are just trying to profit off of primesenses work. Primesense is gone off and doing their on thing now. MS is trying to force that device down everyones throat now. Microsoft only pays attention to what sells. They dont care about the quality of the overall product. It was a fad riding off of the Wii's success. MS knows this, hence why they force bundled it.
3) Incorrect on so many levels. This is Sonys third Eyetoy. They've NEVER FORCED BUNDLED IT.
This is not an arugment. Sorry to say. Was nice chatting.
