Nem said:
Spazzy_D said:
Nem said:
t3mporary_126 said:
I blame the Wii for opening the pandora box of causal gamers who would not return and I blame Nintendo for not attracting them back to home consoles. So it's really Nintendo's fault for not making a true successor to the Wii because we all knew Sony and Microsoft were less likely to do so.
|
Its funny cause during the gen, people would complain that the Wii was for casuals and demanded a more hardcore system. Funny how it works.
|
Wii U isn't a hardcore system though, either. It's not competitive graphically with Microsoft and Sonys offerings and even if it aschews motion controlls for dual analog it's still a gimmicky controller.
|
I have to disagree. Once it lost motion controls as its main use of control and used a controller, it stopped beeing aimed at casuals and became aimed at hardcores. Hardcore is not just someone who likes pretty graphics. Its someone who likes to play good games without gimmicks.
|
It wasn't aimed at casuals, either. It tried to be everything to everyone but didnt realize what would actually appeal to either crowrd. A real hardcore system would have sold better I think, not great, but more on pace to at least match the N64 in numbers.