tbone51 said:
Somini said:
tbone51 said:
Somini said:
Told you the meta for this game wouldn't be higher than 70, after the first reviews came in. I think this game is rushed, hence the bad scores.
If not for the game draught on the WiiU, this game could've afforded to launch later and be better received. |
since your soooooo confident why dont you put your money where your mouth is (in this case sig control). We bet, yu win if it gets 70 or lower i win if it gets a 71 or higher
|
Why should i make a bet about a prediction just because you don't agree with it? Search for another means of ''proving'' how right you are. I'm predicting this and your bias is not going to change my mind.
|
ok then, i guess your word is meaningless. You sounded like you were confident, so i called it out, but your backing out of your statement so yeah? If i said i bet ps4 wont sell more than 5mil this year, then somebody calls me out on it (this case a bet) and i said wat you just said then it makes me look bad.
Dont state something then totally go back on your word
|
I´m not backing out of my statement and you´re welcome to read into that whatever suits your point of view. A specific group on this site don´t like my words, but i´m not gonna make a bet everytime one doesn´t agree with me. Predicting something and being wrong is not gonna make anyone look bad, unless you´ve got a reputation for it, like a couple of users around here whom both, surprise, surprise blindly favor Nintendo.
Back to the topic at hand, we´ve had 3 reviews of this game so far and they were like: 9, 7 and this 5 from Gamespot. If the game does end up with a meta of 74 for example, i´m not gonna think oh man was i wrong. I´m simply stating how wrong it is to expect every Nintendo game to be a 90± on metacritic just because Nintendo = perfection in the eyes of some.
