By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GProgrammer on 15 February 2014
Edit Thread
the-pi-guy said:
GProgrammer said:
the-pi-guy said:

I'm not really sure what's going on with the graphs.  The second one starts at month two and has an added month two.  While the bottom one is moved two months back. 

Edit:  I meant month.


Just adjusted so the months match due to them launching on different months

That's not really the weird thing.  
I'm not sure if it's the program thing or I don't know.  But the starting and the last number is 0.  I'm guessing it's something to do with the program needing all the values for comparision.  

But we go from 0 to a number with a slant like this / and then a slant downward to 0 like this.

The difference is that the graphs really should be [1,18) or  [1,17] when really the graph doesn't really show that, that well.  

Like I said Just adjusted so the months match due to them launching on different months

DC launched 2 months earlier than the WII U

so for the first 2 months they stuck 0 in for wii U sales

This is a fairer method than the 3rd graph which compares

nov wii u vs sep dc = first number

dec wii u vs oct dc = 2nd number, the wii u shoots ahead because dec sells more than oct

jan wii u vs nov dc = 3rd number, the dc shoots ahead cause nov > jan