fatslob-:O said:
supernihilist said:
fatslob-:O said:
supernihilist said:
fatslob-:O said:
supernihilist said:
im very surprised by Nintendos inability to put up SW fast....i mean, i n the GC days they put Zelda; Mario, Metroid, Luigi, Wave race, F-zero, Pikmin, Starfox, Eternal darkness and more...in the first 2 years!!
|
Development costs ...
|
yeah but comparatilvely they cant be much more than they were in 2001 when GC was top tech, is not that WiiU games are high budget by todays standard at all, GC games were.
|
The jump to hd development incurs a significant jump in costs.
|
in the year 2001 Nintendo released games that were the top tiers of the industry, how the hell can be that cheaper than releasing all these budget conservative games Nintendo has released on WiiU
imagine what Luigis mansion and Wave race costed together then adjust inflation and what you get cant be cheaper than Pikmin3(Wii project), Zelda WW HD and SM3DWorld.
|
You assume that they are budget conservative but you fail to realize that they are very much the same like the game industry. The fact that W101 costed 30 million dollars just goes to show that nintendo also blows money too. You also forget to account for the fact that hd assets also cost more to produce.
BTW pikmin 3 got moved to the WII U so it also got more expensive to produce.
Even accounting for inflation hd titles still cost more to make.
|
you have no proof W101 costed 30M
Ana NO. Kamiyas trolling doesnt count
HD titles maybe, but budget conservative Nintendo games like SOnic $ MArio, Zelda WWHD, Pikmin 3...etc. i dont think so, you will have to provide some evidence to convince may.
