By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dr.EisDrachenJaeger said:
lt_dan_27 said:
Most people have accepted that the ps4 is stronger. It's just a matter of every number being bigger. Every once in a while you see some moron try and say the xbox one just needs to be fully utilized, but no. The main argument now is how much stronger. I think the xbox one is about 50-60% the power of a ps4. Until people accept that the xbox one is at most 65% the power though, we won't stop seeing things being added to "resolutiongate." Which is the most annoying title ever IMO. It's not a scandal or cover-up, it's simple math.

You gotta look at the performance XD
 PS4 barely even hits its "theoretical peak" of 1.84 gflops


This is my new favorite reply to a comment. And I'll gladly look at the performance. Here's the officially quoted wins for the ps4. 

AC4: 1080pvs900p

CODG: 1080p vs 720p

TR: 50 fps vs 28-30fps. 

BF4: 900p vs 720p

MGS GZ: Everyone whose played it has said that the ps4 version looks substantially better. 

Most of those games have other advantages on the ps4 such as AA, textures, etc. 

And it "barely even hits 'theoretical peak' of 1.84 gflops" is just amazing for so many reasons. First of all, 1,84 gflops is super low, about 1000 times weaker than the ps4. I'll assume you meant tflops though. Anyways though, I'm really confused about what this comment means. Of course it barely reaches its peak performance, that's why it's called PEAK performance. It's not like it can go over it. Do you think the xbox one can always hit peak performance? Because it doesn't.