By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vivster said:
curl-6 said:
vivster said:
I decree that out of the mouth of a Nintendo fan the words "looks" and "amazing" shall be no less than 2 sentences apart from each other.

It looks last gen. But I guess that's fair because Nintendo fans didn't see any last gen games on their last last gen Wii. So seeing this must be amazing to them.

Fail; I've been playing 360 since before I had a Wii, and  this still looks amazing, not just visually, but in terms of how fun it looks.

Also, 2001 called, they want their definition of a generation as solely a graphics leap back.

Yes it looks better than last gen but certainly not next gen. It's last gen with nail polish. I almost cried when that thing crashed into the ground and giant square blocks with only a hint of texture jumped up. That is pitiful.The gameplay looks fun but it's the same as last gens gameplay.

So let us review: Last gen graphics(with a bit of polish) and last gen gameplay. Yep this looks last gen.

I'm not saying it will not be fun or that I will not play it(I will). But it certainly does not look amazing. It would've been amazing 5 years ago but times change and we shouldn't hold current gen games to last gen standards.

So will you let me play this, have fun with this but still cry because of the missing progress? Thanks.

You're barking up a very dangerous tree with this comment specifically. There is a way to phrase your desire that does not denigrate the Wii U.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.