By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BMaker11 said:
Dr.Grass said:
People are shitting themselves because OMG $30 for a DEMO OMG OMG!

$30 is cheapo for a glimpse into my favourite game series debuting on next gen hardware. And it won't be 2 hours long. That's just retarded.

I think it's funny that MGSGZ was on the MS stage at e3 and now people like kowenicki are decrying it's value.

Exactly. If you play it through normally, it will be much longer than 2 hours.

Otherwise MGS4 was a "demo" because it only had "an hour and a half of content" yet it's one of the highest rates games from last gen, one of the highest rated games of all time, and arguably the second best entry into the series (depending on where you place 1 and 3). GZ is definitely getting downplayed because the PS4 version is apparently superior

But if people want to get technical, the game is a "prologue" anyway, so it's gonna be budget priced. People complaining about "paying full price for a demo" don't realize that you won't be paying "full price", which I'm assuming they're thinking $60. Same thing happened with GT5:P last gen, and people got over the downplaying after it came out and began to respect it for being a good game. Same will probably happen with GZ.

I have another issue with these opinionated people...

Why the hell would they get upset about the prequel to a game if they are not a fan of said game series!? Absolute madness. Do these same people have ANY IDEA that the friggin clothes their girlfriends/wives/themselves wear cost 1/50th of what they pay for to manufacture!?

I knew a middle class german guy that had to wear polo clothes and would pay ~$200 for a white shirt with a stupd little horse or some shit on it.

Now if I want to pay $30 for the prequel to my favourite game series of all time (and there's only been a handful of them in the last 15 years) so that I don't have to wait more than a year to play the full game then WHY is that a problem.


IMO these people should STFU.