Kresnik said:
2) Even worse. A late port like Batman on WiiU at least has some enhanced features making it different from the previous releases. FIFA was merely the same game as on PS360 but a couple of months later (at which point you'd expect everyone who wanted it to have bought it). 3) No, it wasn't. It was bundled as a download code on XB1, but I was directing you towards the PS4 version. The official PS4 bundles have been using Knack and Killzone. If there are unofficial retailer bundles that's fine, but those stand true for WiiU games as well. Also this sentence: "Tomb Raider did relatively poorly whether you're comparing it to other titles on 4One, or to its previous release on PS360." If we're using relatives, why don't we say it did relatively well when you're comparing it to WiiU late ports? I can see you're not going to change your stance on this one though, so we're just going to go around in circles without a conclusion if we carry on with this. |
It's going in circles because it's off the main point I made. Even if TR does double or tripple or more than a title such as Batman:AC (which launched on a userbase 1/10th of what TR is launching to), the the title is still a relative bomb when compared to it's earlier release or other releases on 4One that are not late ports. At .1 of the sales of top software on 4One and .03 of the sales of the original release, it is - mathmatically speaking - much, much more of a realative bomb compared to other releases and at 2-4X Batman:AC much, much closer to Wii U late ports, relatively speaking. It isn't really up for debate where its sales lie. 4X and 30X are not relatively close. It is far more accurate to say that it performed similar to Wii U late ports than to say it performed much better than them.
