By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
J_Allard said:
FatedReality said:
Mummelmann said:
Wait, it's only six versus six? What the hell?


Yeah im confused as to why there seems to be more complaints about the bullet penetration rather then the player cap being at 6v6. I dont really care if theres other npc around 6v6 is pretty low.

Not everyone cares about meaningless numbers like player count.

MAG had a mode with 256 players yet the game is still trash.

Or maybe it was trash, idk if Sony has killed off the servers yet.

Now, on the one hand; player count is not meaningless to me, I noticed a distinct difference in Battlefield 3 on PC and PS3, having half the players removed some intensity and made strategies less crucial.

On the other hand; MAG was chaos, way too many, there was zero dirtection and only a constant skirmish with little to no tactics. Planetside 2 did a hugely better job at it (a very good one actually).

Titanfall is more fast-paced and less tactical than Battlefield, which isn't a bad thing, there's room for difference, I also love TF2, which is widely different from BF. If the bots turn out to be really good; this might not be an issue but I do fear that the small number of players will affect the amount of strategy. That said; I am getting this game on PC, never liked MW or BO multiplayer but this looks fantastic right now.

Silly question(s); is there cross-platform play on this and are there differences in the amount of players on PC and console?