Tacked on MP or MP only?

[BMaker11]

kitler53 said:

BMaker11 said:

kitler53 said:
...

let's be honest here, yes you would..

pffft....I didn't even pay $60 for it. I got it used off Half.com for like $35. I get what you're trying to say, but now you're getting into paying for a game twice to get the whole experience.....and then paying again to be able to play it online since online MP is behind a paywall for Sony and MS now. No way, bro

but what defines the "whole experience"? 

if titianfall is a "whole experience" why isn't halo 2x experiences?!   titanfall's MP doesn't seem like it had more content than the MP portion of halo.  halo's SP campain isn't half-assed either.   so why is titanfall worth the full price with only half the content?

Maybe Titanfall shouldn't be $60.....

But then one could argue that maybe SP only games shouldn't be $60. Well, what's it gonna be? Paying $60 for SP and MP or $120 for SP and MP? I would choose the former, because who's to say if SP or MP is "whole" or "complete" before the launch of a game? The game has to be put into our hands before we can appoint value to the SP and MP portions of a game. You wouldn't know Halo's campaign wasn't half-assed if you hadn't played the game, for example. Are we gonna have to listen to publishers? "Hey, those guys may have focused on MP and tacked on SP, but we're guaranteeing an equally fun SP and MP. So buy our game...for $120"

No thank you.