| Fuzzmosis said: I only read part. Complaint 1: Frame input. So, his complaint is he hits A 4 times and wants 4 reactions. That happens in brawl as much as it does other fighting game. It's called weak attacks. When complaining about in comparison to other fighting games, this is pants on head retarded. When he argues the fun portion, seeing as that applies to every single video game since Pong, what the fuck kind of argument is that? This seems like a 17 year old freshman talking for the first time in Philosophy class, smug look on his face as he rattles off psuedo intellectualism a 6 year old could find holes in. Oddly, Leo-J did not. (Welcome back leo) |
Your post is the best for me. Maybe it is because I had to deal with these kind of people every week during University days. If someone can not get to the point in single paragraph them fuck it. There is nothing that pisses me off more in a game reviewer trying to prove something - like his vast vocabulary or that he was did graduate in journalism. Pseudo-intelectuals hate objectivism, for them its like the words itself are magical they have some kind of secret harmony. So by saying that "game X can stablish a perennial semi concordance between the intrinsic contradictions of the human nature" he sounds really smart.
Satan said:
"You are for ever angry, all you care about is intelligence, but I repeat again that I would give away all this superstellar life, all the ranks and honours, simply to be transformed into the soul of a merchant's wife weighing eighteen stone and set candles at God's shrine."
