kitler53 said:
BMaker11 said:
kitler53 said:
kowenicki said: keep 'em separate sometimes... not always.
I hate 'out of context' multiplayer that is tacked on. |
when would you keep both?
...i played U3's MP quite a bit. especially by my standards as i generally don't even give a game the benefit of a doubt of 1 MP match. now imo, U3 did both SP and MP well. in fact, i would go so far as to say either mode was worth the full $60 purchase. so why not split them and sell the SP for $60 and the MP for another $60?
halo could probably do this too. more monies for the developer. ..and with more monies, in theory, a more complete development cycle for each mode meaning even better, more full-featured gameplay.
|
Woah, slow down there, Satan.
No way am I paying $120 for Halo 3, for example (if such a business model existed in 2007).
|
let's be honest here, yes you would..
|
pffft....I didn't even pay $60 for it. I got it used off Half.com for like $35. I get what you're trying to say, but now you're getting into paying for a game twice to get the whole experience.....and then paying again to be able to play it online since online MP is behind a paywall for Sony and MS now. No way, bro