By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
joora said:
vivster said:
Aielyn said:
vivster said:

Nothing wrong here and the title is misleading.

No one is keeping people from giving it a bad review.

Nothing wrong with the title.

No one is keeping people from reading further. The fact that people might be influenced by the title itself shouldn't bother you at all.

EA doesn't block any reviews so the title is not only wrong but inflammatory.

It's an in-app feedback function that doesn't even claim to use the review scores on google play. Everyone is free to give a bad review on google play.

 

Yep, it's a "feedback function" that encourages me to rate the game only if I promise I'll behave nicely. Absolutely nothing wrong with that. I think they should enforce implement similar system on game journalist reviews... oh, wait.

But journalist can give a bad review, he just need to buy the game after it goes to stores (just a lot after it could have any impact) or they could rate without playing it (more common on high rates) which would be unethical.





duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."