KingofTrolls on 10 February 2014
| InitiatedSpoon said: I don't want to sound overly harsh towards NA but it's generally well accepted by anyone in the armed forces around Europe that the US army is poorly trained and highly arrogant/unprofessional and typically only wins engagements due to their superior tech... The only reason Europe is so far behind is simply because the governments here cannot convince their citizens such spending is needed whereas is quite easy to convince the apish and moronic masses that such things are needed in the US especially. European society focuses much less on military accomplishment unlike in NA and we're much less fixated on warfare. However NA would probably win if they could get it over and done with quickly simply due to their superior tech and the reach of their Navy and Airforce. If Europe could draw them out into a lengthy war (a few years) eventually they would win. |
Europe alone ( or maybe EU to be more precise ) is close to nothing vs US. Everybody agreed with this. US got a lot of military camps/bases in Middle East so they can attack from 2 sides, moreover they can hit directly almost all oil/gas pipelines, day one. Moreover, a lot of european countries like Italy, Spain, Greece, Romania Bulgaria etc is miliaty sh*t with no real opportunity to even defend themselves. Only Germany, France and UK ( Royal Navy ) can fight, but not so long. That's why Russia change the whole situation - with EU forces, they can immediately ,, turn off " almost all of US's Middle East bases. This is the most important factor.
