DerNebel said:
I believe what he means is that when Sony gets $50 for a 12 month PS+ subscription they only account the part of the 12 months as revenue that have already passed, the rest is accounted as a liability since Sony haven't completed their part of the deal and provided a working online network for those coming months yet. So as an example when someone get a 12 month PS+ subscription on December 1st and the quarter ends on December 31st, only 1/12th of the $50 is actually accounted as revenue, because Sony has only fulfilled 1/12th of its part of the deal. The rest is accounted as a liability cause they still own the person 11 months of PS+. In the coming quarter Sony then accounts the next 3/12th of the $50 as revenue and so and so, until the 12 month contract is completed. I guess that is what he had in mind, that being said I have no idea if this is really how it's done with PS+ or Xbox live. |
This is exactly what I was trying to say. Now, Im making some assumptions as Japanese accounting rules are different than ours, but i'd wager they are the same regarding this. As for microsoft, they have no choice, FASB says they can only recognize revenue as it is earned (ie once they have provided the service).
Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.







