pokoko said:
You're talking pure supposition here. There are plenty of high-quality third-party titles. Developing for more than one console only takes more time. If there is enough time, the quality can and should equal that of a single-console game. |
And yet it doesn't. Every gamer everywhere knows that the biggest titles to look forward to on any system are the 1st party titles. There's a general and knowing expectation that it WILL be a QUALITY game, because it's FIRST party.
I get your point, and I actually AGREE that quality should not be tied to multi-platform, but because money is not infinite, it unfortunately IS tied to quality. Sure, if a game had a 5 year development time and 100 million dollars, I'd bet it could walk right up to a first party title and say hello, but NO one would ever do that: a console's lifespan makes a 5 year development time absolutely unprofitable.







