By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
snyps said:

i know i'm a fanboy and all but did he really just compare ZeldaHd remake to ico/gow collection remake and call that a valid criticism? wtf he's a flaming sony fanboy.

 

FROM THE ARTICLE: Here’s an example of a valid criticism: “$50 is too much for any HD remake, especially when Sony gave us HD sets with multiple games for $40 on the PS3.”

 

just look at the gamecube price on ebay

http://www.ebay.com/sch/Video-Games-/139973/i.html?_from=R40&_sop=15&LH_BIN=1&_nkw=wind+waker+gamecube&_dcat=139973&rt=nc&LH_ItemCondition=2750

and then check out the ps2 ico price...

http://www.ebay.com/sch/Video-Games-/139973/i.html?_from=R40&LH_BIN=1&_sop=15&LH_ItemCondition=2750&_nkw=ico&_dcat=139973&Platform=Sony%2520PlayStation%25202&rt=nc

 

So aside from the fact that Windwaker is more valuable than the ps2 sets.   There was also more done to Celda than just adapting to HD such as gameplay enhancements, altered quests, added gamepad features... Clearly this article is written from someone that is not impartial.

Wow, you're doing exactly what the author said a fanboy would do, take something that deserves to be criticized and try to somehow justify it.

The fact that Wind Waker sells for that much on Ebay doesn't even come close to giving Nintendo a reason to sell the remake for $50. Also what does it matter if Nintendo did some extra stuff on the Wind Waker HD remake? It still took only 6 months to develop, they don't have to cover huge development costs for the game.

Nintendos choice to price the game at $50 is bullshit and does not need to be defended.