By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DeadBigfoot21 said:
adriane23 said:
DeadBigfoot21 said:
Mummelmann said:
DeadBigfoot21 said:

I finally agree with this. I've never agreed to anything he's said before but now i do.

Paying to play old games that i already bought and played? I think not.


Is it preferable to keep three consoles under the TV instead? Neither the PS4 nor PS3 are backwards compatible, if you want to play games from all generations; you'll need a PS2, PS3 and a PS4 in the same setup. I much prefer having it all in one, if for no other purpose than a more streamlined experience. Besides; a lot of these older games can be practically impossible to track down in physical copies. Not to mention that you won't actually need to purchase a Vita or PSP in order to play their games.

It won't be terribly different from the current PS+ in structure, only a lot more all-encompassing and ultimately cheaper for what you get. I would much rather pay for something like this than PS+. Of course; that may not be the case for a lot of other people.

No thanks i dont want to replay old games. If i do then thats why i have a collection. Isn't that why people collect games? to replay them when they want. 

Suikoden II is $137.89 used on Amazon.

Well if you would have collected that game in the first place then you wouldn't have to pay that much, now would you? 

Hey, it was the 90s and I wasn't old enough to get a job back then. By the time I could afford it, I could only find a used one with no manual and I ended up getting it for my brother for his birthday. So there.



I am the Playstation Avenger.