adriane23 said:
DeadBigfoot21 said:
Mummelmann said:
DeadBigfoot21 said:
I finally agree with this. I've never agreed to anything he's said before but now i do.
Paying to play old games that i already bought and played? I think not.
|
Is it preferable to keep three consoles under the TV instead? Neither the PS4 nor PS3 are backwards compatible, if you want to play games from all generations; you'll need a PS2, PS3 and a PS4 in the same setup. I much prefer having it all in one, if for no other purpose than a more streamlined experience. Besides; a lot of these older games can be practically impossible to track down in physical copies. Not to mention that you won't actually need to purchase a Vita or PSP in order to play their games.
It won't be terribly different from the current PS+ in structure, only a lot more all-encompassing and ultimately cheaper for what you get. I would much rather pay for something like this than PS+. Of course; that may not be the case for a lot of other people.
|
No thanks i dont want to replay old games. If i do then thats why i have a collection. Isn't that why people collect games? to replay them when they want.
|
Suikoden II is $137.89 used on Amazon.
|
Well if you would have collected that game in the first place then you wouldn't have to pay that much, now would you?
