blaydcor said:
sc94597 said:
blaydcor said:
AND because 3d =/= better gameplay. If a game designer has specific vision for a game that involves 2D gameplay, they're going to make it 3d.
I think any long-time gamer would agree with me; 2D and 3D both have their advantages, but neither, on its own, instantly qualifies a game as superior.
Symphony of the Night, Super Metroid, Pokemon, Patapon, just to name a random few. Would 3d make any of these games better? No, in fact, they would probably lose a lot of their personality, and most likely end up not being as good a game anyway. |
My opinion is 3d graphics are better, but the 2d perspective is = to a 3d perspective mattering on the game. So their should be some more 2.5d games on the ds instead of 2d games. |
2.5d, imo, is the worst of both worlds. Liniearity of 2D, but the uncharming, non-artistic look/feel of 3d. Another big reason you saw SO many 3d games back on the N64/PS1 is because, for consoles, it was a relatively young technology, so of course it had a lot more novelty factor, resulting in most developers going the 3D path so they'd seem more cutting edge.
|
Yeah good point. So I guess only major games with large budgets and that usually tend to hardcore gamers come with 3d while casual games that have small budgets go 2d. I would love to see a sidescrolling metriod though. Metroid was at it's best in 2d. I still like the prime series though.
