prayformojo said:
In a way, this is exposing the truth about modern AAA publishers. It's letting us see who's who. There use to be a time when the line of thinking was "come up with great original idea, make great game with as much content as humanly possible to entertain the gamer, profit". Now it's mostly "create product, market product, make as much profit as possible from product, repeat". The game industry has become the movie industry now. It's basically Nintendo and indie devs that still do it the old way, the RIGHT way. Unfortunately, greed is taking over. |
This whole idea of "nowadays retail games are incomplete and you have to buy DLC to have the complete experience" is one of the biggest bullshits the gaming community has thrown around in the last few years. I cannot think of a single game that was ACTUALLY incomplete, that REQUIRED you to buy extra content to get the full game. DLC is an extension of the game, not a part removed from the game and then sold elsewhere. If you don't buy it, you're not missing the core of the game.
In fact, your whole post is a synthesis of the strange notion that most Nintendo's fans have: Nintendo are the good guys, and third-parties are downright evil for not releasing games for the Wii U. Yeah, fuck those evil publishers!
And you know of the biggest franchises in gaming? GTA? Yeah, that has a lot of content and barely any DLC. AC also has a lot of content and the games are fun, despite being yearly instalments (which, unlike popular belief, are not synonym with horrible games and the bane of the gaming industry).
I'll give you this though: on-disc DLC is indeed bullshit. The content is already there, but you can't access it? Yeah, no thanks Capcom.








