| kidvizious said: Winning every time convincingly does make you P4P. Ward doesn't "destroy" his opponents but he dominates and controls the whole fight. That is why he is generally accepted as 2nd in the P4P list.
This isn't a street fight. This is boxing. You can fantasize/imagine all you want about what would happen in a street fight but this is boxing, not a street fight. Pac is the better fighter. You are right. But Floyd is the better boxer and frankly, the sport is "Boxing". Yes, thrashing weight drained, left overs, from Floyd. Basically sloppy seconds.
You need to stop looking for "bLood! Hardcorez! OMG!" and learn to appreciate the finesse, skill, brutality, mental thinking, and everything else that goes into the sport.
Yes, but Roach hasn't done anything to help Pac against counter punches. Which Floyd is. |
Instead of making assumtion of what i like and such why dont you pay attention to what i say?
I love Moneys boxing, i love boxing as a fact, finesse and skill are my fav way of winning. I didnt like Pac before Roach. He was a brawler that threw the one-two to the jaw all the time. Roach said it himself. Pac before him didn know shit about boxing.
Pac in 2008 is just a boxing machine. His per formances against much bigger opponents were astounding. His boxing skills were number 2 only second to Floyd, but he had so much heart and was phisically a beast. His style of in and out and angles wouldve hurt Floyd, im sure of that. I still think Floyd wouldve played defense and probably wouldve won by decision. but only probably, like 60/40 %.
I think Pac is better against counteres than it was back then when Marquez vs Pac 1. Marquez was lucky last time face it. Pac lost balance with Marquez fot which lead to Pac falling to his big right, that wouve not landed otherwise. Pac was destroying Marquez like he did with Cotto, Margarito, De la Hoya, Mosley...the same guys Money had trouble with.
