The publisher you despise the most.

[Raven]

Muffin31190 said:

RavenXtra said:

Muffin31190 said:

kumagawa said:

Muffin31190 said:

OdinHades said:
Übisöft, because they make shitty games imo.

This thread is about Publishers, not developers ...

Ubisoft are a publisher they are Europe's largest.

Ok, but what I am saying is that people who usually "make" games are Developers, not Publishers.

Wouldn't that exlude your own choice as well? Nintendo develops like 80% of the games they publish.

OT: Definitely EA. Just a very shady business in general.

This is what first party is to nintendo, so look at all of the nintendo games that are made and you will see that none are made by Nintendo but they are developed by Nintendo EAD (or others) which are 1st party developers so technically what you said is wrong. 

Is this not your quote? "Ok, but what I am saying is that people who usually "make" games are Developers, not Publishers."

I'm not sure why you think first-party studios like Nintendo EAD, Nintendo SPD, Monolith Soft, Intelligent Systems, etc. are not part of Nintendo? Nintendo owns these studios and the employees are part of their corporate heirarchy, and they make games solely for this company. This makes Nintendo a developer with multiple studios, who also publishes their own games as well as for other studios.

In this same example Ubisoft is a developer that also publishes its own games. Ubisoft is made up of multiple studios that all produce games solely for Ubisoft. If you count Ubisoft as a developer, then I don't see why you'd exclude Nintendo from the same definition.

I don't want to seem harsh or anything, but I'm not sure where you're coming from on that subject.