Mystro-Sama said:
What games didn't you like? |
Virtually every single one of them. Assassin's Creed really turned me off because it was too damn easy. The game thinks that the player is a moron who can't do anything by himself. I don't like that. Also Far Cry, went to shit with part 2 and 3. I mean, they tried to do a nice open world shooter, but they just copied stuff from countless other games so it lacks its own identity. That was really boring to me. If I hadn't get Far Cry 3 free with Plus, I probably wouldn't have bothered playing it at all. I heard Rayman is good, but that's not my type of game, so I never played it. What more is there? Yearly iterations of Just Dance? Nah, thanks. Anyone remember Haze?
Of course it's a personal thing, but that's what the question in the OP is all about, isn't it? Ubisoft also tried to screw PC Players with shitty DRM all the time, I didn't forget that like so many other folks. Oh, and about that developer vs. publisher thingy. Ubisoft is a publisher, I don't like their games, end of story. If there is a publisher who does brilliant politics for the players but lacks good games, I won't start to like that publisher all of a sudden. Good games are the bare minimum for me to sympathize with a company. Everything else is just a bonus.
Official member of VGC's Nintendo family, approved by the one and only RolStoppable. I feel honored.
