Analyst firm says Sony is responsible for Nintendo's lack of third party content

[Zod95]

EricFabian said:

1- N64 CPU was most powerful back then, more RAM, N64 was... a 64 bits console, PS1 was 32 bits one. But like you said PS utilises CD as its game media

2- GT4 is, indeed, a beautiful game, but is not the best. I think here is a matter of opinion. But to me Rogue Squadron 2 is superior to GT4 and GCN version  of Splinter Cell

3- And no Wii U is 8th. Is weaker than PS4/X1? Yes, of course. But power =/= generation

1 - How much more powerful? More RAM can be a little more or much more, you need to quantify. Same for the CPU. And the 64 bit was just twice more the 32 bit. Those kind of differences are very small when we talk about hardware. For something that evolves exponentially, anything less than 5 times more is not significant. Moreover, you're not talking about all the paremeters, just some, which proves very little (even if we're only talking about which one is more powerful).

So I'm still waiting for proof about the "way more powerful" N64 against PS1 and Game Cube against PS2.

2 - Then please tell me your opinion about which one of these has the most impressive graphics (hint: there is one that's from a "way less powerful" console):

 

3 - For me generations are defined through power. I don't put Zeebo in the same generation as X360 or XOne. I don't put Wii in the same generation as PS3. And I don't put Wii U in the same generation as PS4. But the main point is: Wii U is 7th gen tech and that's why it's not selling.