burninmylight said:
1. Never said they're equal. They don't have to be equal. I also never named specific consoles, did I? Yes, the original post came from a Wii U vs. Vita thread, but this is an entirely different thread with a different subject. Therefore, there is no need to turn this into a Console A vs. Console B thread. But even if it was, let's get back to my original point that it's not about digital stores being equal in terms of sales, it's about the fact that every single modern console (counting handhelds as consoles, just to be clear) has a viable digital store that sales both indy and retail games, yet console detractors conveniently forget this when downlplaying a specific game's or consoles sales. And the fact is, we don't know the facts for the vast majority of digital sales, so just about discussion about sales numbers needs to come with an asterisk. Unless of course, it's a game or console you don't care for. 3. Ah, but you do see it? So you acknowledge it happens. I can't name names. That would get me banned. 4. I've addressed this in my last thread. I see this issue in political and sports journalism as well. The problem with anonymous sources is that people who aren't very credible or qualified to speak on a certain matter can get away with things they would have been called out on if they didn't have the veil of secrecy. You can't consider the biases and weigh the competence of a source if you don't know where it comes from. If you disagree with me on this, then so be it. 5. Fanboys making a big deal about which console is beating the others in total sales instead of looking at the financial bottom line. |
I know it's just for fun. Aren't almost all of the threads here just for fun? I didn't agree with most of your points so I wanted to give my opinion. It's not serious at all. Don't you read a lot of people's replies in the same mannor as your op and disagree with their jokes?