By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheLegendaryWolf said:
vivster said:

I don't even know how you could interpret what I just said in that way.

I'm just saying that consoles should at least try to match the power of a pc more closely and that people should be more objective when it comes to simple stuff like pixel count. They shouldn't pretend that games are "amazing enough" if they clearly haven't reached their full potential and don't need more power or even that there wouldn't be a difference.

It takes time for games to look their best on any console, including PS4 and XB1. PC's have no definate limits besides graphic cards and processing speed, which can be customized by the consumer's personal taste and desire.

That's absolutely correct. The deal here is that 1080p/60 fps is kind of a fixed barrier for gaming and it was now for several years and probably already at the conception of the new consoles. When the old consoles came out barely anyone had an HDTV and it was ok that the consoles wouldn't run higher than what was available at that time. But this is the new gen. Full HD is standard in a lot of homes already, blu-ray movies are in 1080p. But yet the consoles can't even match the pixels most people have on their screens and with 4K on the horizon it will only get worse from here. A console should at least be up to date in the year it releases, they are not. That's the sad part.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.