Kytiara said:
I would agree with you Lingyis except for the fact that those who are pushing AGW want to spend billions, if not trillions, of dollars attempting to solve a problem that may or may not even exist. I feel that the money could be better spent on something we know is happening, such as preventing the 25 million people who die every year because they don't have food to eat or clean water to drink. The latest IPCC report claims we'll see at most a few degree's celcius increase between now and 2100. Nobody knows exactly how this will effect the world. Some claim it will actually improve many parts of the world. Others claim it will lead to mass flooding and the worst parts of the bible. But it is a measurable fact that in the next 12 months, around 25 million people will die because they lack basic and essential requirements. So tell me, why is it so important to hedge our bets on something like AGW when we can see people dying today? |
Clearly, you're among those who don't understand the hedging logic. I see no point in pursuing this further.
As to the "people dying today" argument: simply unbelievable, what more can I say.
the Wii is an epidemic.
