Nintendo does not need a graphical successor to the U

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

padib said:

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
I would much prefer if Nintendo had a home console and a handheld instead of just a handheld cause I always find that when playing on a handheld, the layout has to be adjusted in a way to have portability a higher priority than ergonomics when it comes to the feel of the controller vs home consoles have a higher priority for ergonomics than portability...

So in other words, I feel that controllers for wiiU/ps4/x1 > 3ds/vita (well no shit right?) but if what Nintendo's next console is a full blown tablet, they will have to sacrifice in one or the other or else it won't be practical.. and for games like Smash Bros, Metroid, Zelda, Beyonatta and others where precision is key, the ergonomics is very important... Hopefully you guys are trying to understand what I am trying to say lol

Of all the companies out there making hardware, don't you think nintendo could pull it off? Do you remember how amazing the Wii remote was. You could play it in two directions, it had an extension port, it was litterally a miracle piece of HW. I think Nintendo needs to work its magic to create a portable device which is uber-light and could be embedded in a controller for use at home.

It really shouldn't be soo far-fetched since airplay, surface and other similar technologies are already so close, not to mention Samsung's work on paper-like screens which unfold from a wallet-sized container.

Yea but how do you make triggers portable? The reason that the vita and 3ds and any tablet thats ment to go out of your house doesn't have triggers is that it gets in the way of portability... They need some sort of magical fairy dust to make that happen and they can't afford not to if they are targetting the home console market as well