dgm6780 on 08 June 2007
| rocketpig said: Mentioning Home as a selling point while comparing it to Second Life is flat-out silly. Second Life is FREE. It runs on most computers that people already use in their homes. It's largely populated by casual "gamers" (using the term "gamer" very loosely in reference to these people). These people WILL NOT pay $600 to play a cut-down version of the game they're already playing for free. Could we please shut the f*** up about this? While it's a nifty addition to the PS3, it's not, nor will it ever be, a system seller. There are plenty of other points to make about the success/failure of the PS3. Leave Home out of it, it just makes your argument sound stupid. /endrant |
Home is relevant because it makes Xbox Live look last gen. Its the comparisons to MS that matter, not the comparisons to Second Life.
