BraveNewWorld said:
This isn't about a Nintendo title being enjoyable on another system, it's about it being financially beneficial for Nintendo to do so, and it wouldn't be. Investors would leave and stocks would plummet. Money would be burned expanding as needed. Less money would be made because games would be coming out more slowly. |
This thread isn't about Nintendo jumping ship from one day to another it's about feasibility.
You say it's hard to switch from exclusivity to multiplatform? I guess the people at Ubi and EA are working with magical elves to bring all their titles to multiple platforms. Yes they have about double the employees to realize bigger projects but do you know where they get the money to employ more people? Correct, from realeasing games on multiple platforms to reach a bigger audience and at the same time not losing money on hardware nobody buys.
It's not like Nintendo would be on its own to learn new systems. There are hoards of people at MS and Sony that support developers to make games on their platform. To say it would be too hard for Nintendo and Nintendo-exclusive publishers to port their games on other platforms is simply false. Even indies are doing it. As pure software publishers they wouldn't have the pressure of short release cycles because they wouldn't have to carry hardware sales on their own.
What keeps Nintendo is just their pride and not realizing on how much money they are sitting with all these great IPs. You have no idea to which heights their stocks would rise if they announced their IPs to come to multiple platforms.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.