curl-6 said:
dsage01 said:
curl-6 said:
dsage01 said: I didn't count in a couple scores due to being waay to unreasonable and giving it a zero or a one..or not playing the full component of a game |
What's the point of asking for ratings if you're going to arbitrarily decide which ones you accept? Might as well just decide the rating for yourself if you're going to tailor and influence the results.
|
Do you accept me to accept ratings where people are saying ``game does not work`` and giving it between a 0-3 even though it works for majority of the people. Or people like yourself or neglect the strongest component of this game. I feel there should be some level of moderation or there would be no difference between this and the overly biased metacritic user scores. But I agree, I should defintley update the OP saying that if you give any video game below the user score of 50 or much below the average score it should be very well explained just so the score can stay as free from trolling as possible.
|
There is no way to weed out bias, because everybody has a bias.
Your only choice is whether or not to tamper with the results.
|
I`m not saying I can completly get rid of the bias in the scores. However I can make it significantly less with not accpeting scores that are extremely low without a reasonable explanation.