Seriously, Nintendo is not THAT Important

[lt_dan_27]

curl-6 said:

lt_dan_27 said:

curl-6 said:

It's only been out a few months, casual games have legs.

You deliberately misinterpret my word use. Many people are obviously fine with  Kinect being bundled, considering Xbone's respectable sales.

Game developers say that the window for profit is usually only about 1-3 months at this point. After that, the bulk of the sales are from pre-owned. Those aren't counted as new sales (obviously). It will maybe reach 1.2-1.5 million. That's not bad, but I wouldn't consider that huge. 

And I was "deliberately misinterpreting" to prove a point. I bet most people would rather get a console for less than 400 without the stupid camera. But I guess some people would rather have a corporation call them stupid if they don't want it. 

That's true for most games, but not Nintendo's, which sell new at full price for years. And it will sell much, much more than 1.5 million, just watch.

I'm not a fan of Kinect myself, I don't like it being bundled, but the fact that it is selling well with it...

Nintendo games sell at full price for not just one year, but multiple?? WOW! That's amazing. Except for these few exceptions. ZombiU, lego city undercover, super luigi, new super mario bros, Pikmin 3 (possibly), Sonic lost world... I think you get the point. Don't say I'm misinterprettying what you're saying intentionally again. When you assign a numeric value to something, that's what people assume you mean. If you say years, I expect more than 2. You're the one being misleading in this context. 

Also, the xbox one would probably being killing ps4 in north america if it had launched at a lower price with an optional sensor as an accessory. They basically just gave up every territory, and made the US a huge battle ground. Which it wouldn't be if the numbers were similar to last gen.