Seriously, Nintendo is not THAT Important

[Michael-5]

lucidium said:

Michael-5 said:

Anyway I think this debate is over, you've already agreed Nintendo is an innovative leader, so I was right the whole time . Plus if you think things like an ethernet port is innovative, well.....you don't understand what that word means.

The manual for the console lists them as shoulder buttons, and is the first reference (ever) to them, your opinion does not change that fact.

Michael-5 said:

Plus if you think things like an ethernet port is innovative, well.....you don't understand what that word means.

Again, if including an ethernet port and hard drive to a console, is not innovation, neither is "adding two more buttons" (your claim of nintendos innovation for controllers).

You can dodge reality all you want, you spouted a bunch of nonsense across several posts, got corrected on much of it with hard facts and flat out denied much of it, everyone else reading the discussion can see that so your attempts to bait me in to stooping to your level pass by amusingly.

Also you can keep telling me you corrected me all you want, but the only instances where you actually tried were instances where you tried to refute reality, by posting more incorrect information.

The proof is in the pudding dear boy, and since much of your pudding has been quoted, it's all there, black and white for everyone to see, you have through your evasion already admitted you were wrong on much of what you originally posted (by engaging in counter arguments, which contridict your initial claims) so as you say this convosation is over.

Have a nice day.

Bet you're going to tell me that I'm wrong again

http://www.videogameconsolelibrary.com/images/Manuals/82_Atari_5200-Manual.pdf

The manual never mentions "Shoulder buttons" but it does mention two "fire buttons" on the "sides" of the controller. Look at page 5 in the Controller Description.

Like you said, "The proof is in the pudding." Like you also said "Nintendo is innovative." What else are you going to try to argue? You already admited that Nintendo is innovative, and that was the arguement which I presented. Honestly who cares if some debunk company in the 70's made 3D gaming without glasses, Nintendo made it popular with the 3DS, and that's where I'd give them credit (not the Virtual Boy). Who cares if Mattel created the Power Glove which Nintendo holds the licence for? It's still Nintendo.