Seriously, Nintendo is not THAT Important

[Aerys]

curl-6 said:

Aerys said:

You are so much wrong both of you.

Sony and MS consoles are totally different since sony consoles have good japan and first party support, same as nintendo ( about the first party support, because they wont get much support from japan this generation on Wii U), so it's totally insane to say ms consoles and sony consoles are twins just because they share 80% of their libraty, like i explained, it's nonsens

Like i said, nintendo exclusives are not more "special/innovative/creative" than sony exclusives and not more numerous, they have both good first party support, and the only fact making Wii U different when it comes to games is the lack of third party support

Sony focuses on M-rated blockbusters that ape Hollywood.

MS focuses on M-rated blockbusters that ape Hollywood.

Their approach to gaming is virtually the same.

Nintendo doesn't do this; they create games for all ages, with more focus on gameplay.

You're absolutely not objective here, they are all focus on gameplay and nintendo is not the only one to create kid rated games. ( and i wouldnt say they bring a lot of variety, without all the marios blockbuster... Mario Mario Mario and Mario. The games Nintendo pushes and promotes the most, the ones they focus on, are the kid rated blockbusters. They may dabble in the M rated friendly  times to times, but so does Sony.)

In fact , it's the opposite, Sony has the biggest focus on the variety , they are not focused on kid games or M rates games, they make a good amount of each one.