Seriously, Nintendo is not THAT Important

[Aerys]

curl-6 said:

theRepublic said:

Aerys said:

theRepublic said:
If we are just talking about the big 3 hardware makers, Nintendo is easily the most irreplaceable. Sony and Microsoft are so similar that they could easily replace each other in the event one of them goes out of business. Third parties would pretty easy replace the content they make.

Who replaces Nintendo?

You should add " imo" after such insanity

That weren't called the "HD twins" for no reason.

Agreed. It's not even their incredibly similar libraries, their whole philosophy and approach to gaming is nigh identical.

You are so much wrong both of you.

Sony and MS consoles are totally different since sony consoles have good japan and first party support, same as nintendo ( about the first party support, because they wont get much support from japan this generation on Wii U), so it's totally insane to say ms consoles and sony consoles are twins just because they share 80% of their libraty, like i explained, it's nonsens

Like i said, nintendo exclusives are not more "special/innovative/creative" than sony exclusives and not more numerous, they have both good first party support, and the only fact making Wii U different when it comes to games is the lack of third party support