Seriously, Nintendo is not THAT Important

[theRepublic]

lucidium said:

theRepublic said:

lucidium said:

theRepublic said:

Aerys said:

theRepublic said:
If we are just talking about the big 3 hardware makers, Nintendo is easily the most irreplaceable. Sony and Microsoft are so similar that they could easily replace each other in the event one of them goes out of business. Third parties would pretty easy replace the content they make.

Who replaces Nintendo?

You should add " imo" after such insanity

That weren't called the "HD twins" for no reason.

Do you think it wouldnt have been the "hd triplets" had the wii enough power to port all the multi plats to or something?

If the Wii still had motion controls, then no.

Because Kinect and PSMove don't exist either right?

And I'll just say this now, if Nintendo bowed out, its customers would just move to mobile devices, like most of the Wii crowd already have done (see the outstanding success of the WiiU)

For a long time, those didn't exist.  The term pre-dated both of those by years.

And if you want to get back to the thread topic, Nintendo was the company that popularized motion gaming.  Neither of those would exist right now if it were not for Nintendo.  Yet another reason they are important.