Max King of the Wild said:
Ponyless said:
If you're honestly being serious with that, i don't think it's worth responding. That's like saying, yea you got an 8/10 on this test but when you realllllly think about it 6 of them were really easy questions so you really got a 2 out of 4 therefore you failed the test. You're trying way too hard to discredit vgchartz because you personally don't like it, there's tons of other numbers you can use if you want to do that, and you don't have to spin those numbers too.
|
terrible fucking analogy and not even remotely similar. Your telling me if VGC tracked the Wii at 5m sales last year and it only sold 3m that would be fine because they are only 2% off? lol lol lol
|
How is your analogy even remotely similar.... if in this situation they tracked it at 5m and it was actually 3m, the error would have been 40%. Where's the 2% coming from? Don't half ass your analogies.
