pokoko said:
To be blunt, it doesn't matter if you like it or even if I like it, the fact is that Nintendo lost that case in court after it was ruled that the solution Nintendo used showed numerous similarities with an existing patent. Obviously, the judge felt that this had nothing to do with whatever patents Sharp or anyone else might hold. Now, maybe you know the details of the dispute, even though last I read they hadn't been revealed; regardless, if you want to argue the case, you're going to need to take it to Federal court. Complaining to me about it on a forum means nothing. |
The outcome of the case is not the point. You suggested that Nintendo deliberately infringed on others. I pointed out that they had no such intention given that they licsenced technology from Sharp and had them supply the displays.
Nor does one case elimate the fact that they do have a long history of establishing their own patants and respecting the patents from other companies.
And for the record, that courthouse in Marshall, Texas is also a patent troll haven. A 78% win percentage for patent plaintiffs (antional avg is 20%) and is the second busiest courthouse in the country for patents suits. Judge Ward himself has almost never sided with anyone but the plaintiff. Type in Marshall Texas patent and get ready to read hwo many companies are getting screwed. Including Sony and MS and damn near every tech firm you know and love.
The rEVOLution is not being televised







