superchunk said:
You missed his point. Wii U is a drastic change from Wii. While you seem to be arguing its the same. Rol is arguing that Nintendo should have continued with Wii's platform and that would have brought success. |
Well, Nintendo was obviously looking for another Wii like success, but they couldnt come up with a better idea than a 2nd screen... this time for a homeconsole. Its not like Nintendo did not want another success, no one is arguing that. What other options did they have that wouldnt have cost them too much, they probably looked at a dozen ways to implement a new gimmick and decided the gamepad was the most cost effective(and they still lost money per unit).
Its a shame really, Wii was a brilliant idea that no one thought of previously, true to the vision of Yamauchi's "we dont do what other people do", yet Wii U is a product that looks like it was conceived because of the iPad and tablet revolution. A "me too" product, to get the casuals back that had moved on.









