sales2099 said:
No from years of forum dwelling committed to memory :) Your second line just opened a can of worms. Who are you to say how serious I am based on what I own? So only people with a lot of disposable income/time on their hands deserve such a title? If so, that sounds like a title I wouldn't be proud of. What if say, some lead busy lives and only have the time and money dedicated for fun to be on one gaming device that caters to their interests the most? 360 had many of the past gens biggest games, so I could and was a serious gamer in the last several years. Xbox 360 as a single console had it all: huge digital library, multiplats, Xbox exclsuives, but also the famous (or infamous) 360/PC games. This doesn't require me or others to buy a PC gaming rig. I can say I have had little desire to game elsewhere last gen because 360 covered all bases pretty well. Now ask a gamer who prefers PS3, and you will find it rare that they just used a PS3. Huh.....look at that. You are a all-around gamer so you are not part of the mix. |
It's great that you try and divert the conversation from your idiotic statement, but how do you know how serious that guy is who owns god forbid a PC *and* a PS3... What I am saying is that your statement was stupid.
The Xbox360 console had it all for *you*and thats great, but to suggest some underlying theory about two brothers and that the XBOX360 is the gaming device of the world for Xbox users and they don't play on anything else but Xbox because its the ultimate platform...ya di da... is as I said idiotic.
Let me ask a gamer friend who owns a Xbox and an XboxOne... OMG he plays the Simpsons on his tablet..... omg he also has a PC.. OMG your theory is wrecked. Seriously... sometimes your posts...








