Hynad said:
How is it ironic for me? I defend all manufacturers when I think it's deserved. |
I get what Gabe was saying but the comparison isnt really the best one to make. Its probably valid on some level but for most i dont see how it applies.
If we look at the 65 million that Gabe quoted thats the total number of steam accounts of all time. Some of those users have PC's that can only run a handful of games, some can only run games at unplayable FPS etc. Theres so much possibilities with those 65 million.
Those old PC's that need to be upgraded are (in a way) similar to Xbox 360's they can only run older games or newer games with lower quality etc. Eventually the 360 will be completely obsolete in terms of newer games, the same thing applies to older PC's. This brings us to the pros and cons of consolve vs. PC gaming. But i dont want to get into that.
A better comparison would be number of Xbox live users compared to steam users. But even that comparison isnt quite right...In any case i think people are naturally going to say that the comparison is a bit silly. The Gabe insults and all the other stuff is obviously not needed but you know how that goes around here :/
Edit: That being said i always find it a bit silly when people ask these type of questions...but if Gabe didnt want to comment on MS console sales then he should have just said that and talked about the steam platform. But by saying they need to catch up to 65 million...thats Gabes way of doing a direct comparison, and thats where i dont think it was the right thing to say. But Gabe says whatever he wants 







