Why does it matter if Wii U games dont look as good as others?

[SubiyaCryolite]

curl-6 said:

SubiyaCryolite said:

curl-6 said:

SubiyaCryolite said:

Feel free to take a look at Twilight and Biebers albums on metcritic Mister (hint, neither are good). Denial is not just  river in Egypt

Twilight and Beiber are popular because many people have a positive opinion of them. And that's all reviews are: opinions.

Your point about popularity affecting scores on Metacritic is nonsense. Dismissing the PS3 having 4 times the amount of 80+ rated games than the Wii on Metacritic is nonsense. You fail to bring up any game or media getting an inappropriate score on metacritic. I'm sure every game you consider good is considered good on metacritic. Same with any game you fairly consider to be bad. So I dont know what your issue with metacritic is. Popularity didnt stop Twilight Saga from getting 50 and 40 metascores. It didn't help killzone, ryse or crysis 3. Resident Evil 6 or Dead Space 3. Didnt affect relatively niche Croc 2 or Escape From Monky Island which Ive always considered good fun games from getting appropriate scores.

Holding up reviews as some bastion of absolute objective truth is nonsense.

Smash Bros Brawl. Metal Gear Solid 4. Grand Theft Auto 4. Heavy Rain. High metacritic scores, shitty games.

lol, wow. One thing to say not your cup of tea but shitty is just going overboard. Heavy Rain wasnt my cup of tea but I still respect what it was trying to do. Same with Portal you wont see me calling it shitty just cause it doesnt excite me. But yeah, you just made your point and I dont agree with it.