By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
outlawauron said:
Arius Dion said:
outlawauron said:

Room for growth is high because it's a sales dud. Technical ability means nothing, especially in the handheld sphere. The vita is the new game gear. Devs support it at their own peril. 

And yet multiple developers are dependent on it. Why do people get so upset when it's pointed out that many developers have found their niche on Vita over 3DS? These are huge titles generally like what you see from Capcom, EA, or Ubisoft, but that doesn't mean those games are worse or any less important.


Nobody's upset, but it makes sense to you to develop for a dud of a system and then act shocked to when it financially ruins you? I find that hilarious. 

It's hard to believe you're not upset when reading your posts. Rather than accepting the fact that developers are happy and profitable on Vita, you say that it's all just bias and agenda against Nintendo and that the platform is a dud and all developers need to "support it at their own peril".

Nah. We are talking about video games. I find it cute you defending a corporation like I insulted your mom or something. I wonder if you and others here would be as forgiving if Sony wasn't on the plastic. We all know the answer to that. 



Bet between Slimbeast and Arius Dion about Wii sales 2009:


If the Wii sells less than 20 million in 2009 (as defined by VGC sales between week ending 3d Jan 2009 to week ending 4th Jan 2010) Slimebeast wins and get to control Arius Dion's sig for 1 month.

If the Wii sells more than 20 million in 2009 (as defined above) Arius Dion wins and gets to control Slimebeast's sig for 1 month.