Cobretti2 said:
oniyide said:
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:
curl-6 said:
| Cobretti2 said:
but the other versions also have glitches. Even the PS54 had some minor framerate issues when it launched. Fixed with a patch. WIi U patch fixed the framerate issues on Ghosts also. You annot expect a game that comes out on 5 platforms to be glitch free unless they delay it for ages to get all the bugs out.
The issue is the audience is not there. The audience has left long ago. Hence why I said earlier Activision need to build a new audience on Wii U (i.e. Wii U owners only), however that will be hard or almost impossible as the console isn't selling that well and because most people these days have at least two consoles.
|
There was an audience, and there still is a potential one, but Activision is doing a fine job of driving them away.
|
no there isnt, the audience left and moved on to PS PC and MS systems long ago, the declining sales of COD games on Wii (and DS) and the fact that both PS4 and Xbone versions did much better the Wii U ones despite being launch titles prove this. THere not on WIi U it is what it is. ANd as for DLC, only 1/3 of the users even buy DLC still think its important.
I wonder what excuses people will use when Watchdogs flops on WIi U or at the very least does the worst and judging by preorders its doing the worst
|
Of course there's an FPS audience on Nintendo consoles. Besides the COD ports, Goldeneye 007 also did well on Wii. And DLC is important because of what it represents; equal treatment. Nintendo gamers got sick of being treated like crap.
Watch Dogs will flop on Wii U because it will be a shitty unoptimised 360 port on a system with just 5 million consoles in the wild.
|
sales prove otherwise, Goldeneye did well, thats one game out of many now how well did FPSs do on other systems keep in mind they both had much smaller install bases. You're grasping at straws, i tell you that most COD players dont even purchase DLC, now youre saying that its not about the actual DLC but what it represents? If thats the case then Acti might as well not even put the game on the system with that attitude. Remember this is a buisness.
How do you know it will be unoptimised? they havent even shown it yet, its like your making excuses before it even drops
|
I agree about the DLC. Hell I even had FREE codes for one of them and couldn't care less and they eventually expired.
Not buying because of a representation is just stupid.
The only 3rd prty game that deserves a hammering in the last few months on Wii U is Batman. That shit was much inferior to the launch game (i.e.e textures, missing features and missing tablet stuff that was one before). To top it off it was outsourced to some d rated developer.
The rest like Deus Ex, COD, ACIV (ubisoft even released the special versions too and where kind enough to replace my sketchbook cause it was damaged), Rayman all are solid games with no more or less faults than their other console counter parts.
|
In Batman's defense it was cheaper and the lack of MP wasnt a lost considering people hated it across the board, but I digress. You're right. Im not saying they are all saints but when ALL the games are flopping something is wrong. Whats funny to me is all of a sudden ALL of them are inferior ports, some people in this thread are straight up lying, hell you can go to the games' wall and see how they praise it (check AC3 for WIi U) and now because the game flopped it must be becasue it was inferior? I remember one time people were bragging that COD BLOPS 2 for Wii U was the best version.
