Carl2291 said:
Would have had to be a totally different machine to be £280. Essentially, the PS3's biggest drawback was that it was the PS3. |
Oddly enough, there's a good chance it could've been more cost-effective if Sony stuck with the original architecture proposals the PS3 had around E3 2005 with the more unified version of the Cell, the drawback being it wouldve been even more obscure to develop for. But since Microsoft jumped the gun with the launch of the 360, I guess they had to go back to the drawing board.
SCEUK have certainly had their head in the sand either way though. No system should ever take 5 and a half years to drop below £200. I wonder if I would even have a PS3 at all today had it not been for the 60GB model discontinuation rush.
Bet with Einsam_Delphin: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=172355&page=11







